The World Cup story was certainly fitting for this time, but I don't think I was able to integrate it properly in the sermon. It was a late minute addition to the sermon. It probably would have fit better if I had more time to consider how how it fit with the sermon.
I also basically left out the Holy Spirit in the sermon, even though it is clearly present in the text. As I was writing the sermon, that seemed like another sermon by itself, but it did seem to me that I neglected the role of the Spirit in the early church. Of course, the one story most people know from Acts is the Pentecost story, so maybe it was good to move beyond the Spirit in a sermon about Acts.
I had some fun with the sermon. As you read the sermon (if you did not hear it), think tongue-in-cheek for the comparison with the Nominating committee.
“Gambling
on God” June 29, 2014; FPC, Troy Acts 1: 1-14; 21-26
Move
1:
How would you like to serve on this Nominating Committee.
That's
right, in the Presbyterian world of church we have Nominating
Committees that meet to find people to present to the congregation
for election as elders, deacons, and trustees.
Nominating
committees sound so formal, so well, so Presbyterian!
But
how would you like to serve on this Nominating committee.
You
would only have to meet once. No fall spent going to multiple
meetings.
And
the meeting would last about 5 minutes or less. No long discussions
about the gifts and talents needed to be a trustee who looks after
the physical plant of the church; or conversations about who might be
good as a deacon, providing pastoral care to members; or who has the
gifts for being an elder and shaping the vision of the church and
dealing with all the issues that come before it.
No
phone calls to people to see if they might be willing to serve, and
then waiting as they prayerfully consider the opportunity.
None
of that. Instead, all the names of the members of the congregation
are put into a big bowl, someone prays over the names and basically
says, “God you pick.”
Then
the names are drawn – first three are elders; next four are
deacons; final two are trustees; or vice versa.
5
minutes or less and the work of the Nominating committee is done.
Who
wants to serve on that Nominating committee.
What
that doesn't sound quite like the committee ought to work?
But,
in fact, it sounds a bit like the way the early church did it in
Acts.
They
have to replace Judas, who have removed himself by first his betrayal
and then the taking of his life, so they cast lots and Matthias gets
chosen.
Sounds
rather random, doesn't it? Almost like rolling the dice and
gambling.
Move
2: That's
how the book of Acts begins.
This
summer we are spending the sermon time reflecting on the significant
moments in Acts.
these
stories of the early church.
These
stories of how the followers of the resurrected Christ engage the
world after Jesus has ascended to heaven and as they wait an
undetermined time for Christ to come again.
The
stories that Luke believes are important enough to write down and
tell a a way of instructing those who will follow.
Instructing
us as try to live out our calling as the body of Christ in our
time and our context.
Move
3: what do we make of how they select Matthias to replace Judas?
a.
Importance of the twelve – connects us back to the disciples Jesus
called; connects us back to Israel. We have a history with God. God
has been at work among us since creation. We are not the first group
of people to try and serve God.
b.
Church is going to around for awhile. We live into our calling as
the body of Christ. Our business is to do Christ’s business until
he comes again.
- Prayer – notice that they pray before they cast lots. In fact, the reason they cast lots is because they want to take their human biases out of the choice; they want to resist the temptation to pick the person they want, and instead let God choose through the casting of lots.
This
is a pattern we discover throughout the Book of Acts. Prayer
precedes every major event in Acts (study notes from The
New Interpreter's Study Bible,
1956)
What
may seem random and uninformed now to our reading was actually a
prayerful attempt to allow God to be at work in the process (of
course, that's why we Presbyterians pray before every meeting,
including meetings of the Nominating Committee).
- In fairness (that is, taking out Richard's exaggerations), when they cast lots in the story in Acts, they have already narrowed the list down to two people who were qualified. To use the example of the Nominating committee, the only names in the bowl would be those who were deemed qualified to serve as officers.Highlights one of our tasks as the church – empower and enable people to develop and use their gifts to serve God.
To
find those who are qualified does not suggest that they arrive in our
midst qualified – we have to continually help people, help
ourselves, to grow in our faith and develop skills for serving as the
body of Christ.
Notice
that the only criteria mentioned was witnesses to the resurrected
Christ. In the case of Matthias and Barsabbas it meant literally
seeing the resurrected Christ. But I like that image for us –
developing the gift of witnessing to the resurrected Christ. That is,
becoming people whose words and actions reveal the life-changing,
life-saving hope of the resurrection.
Baptismal
vows – part of nurturing Trenton is providing him opportunities
Conclusion:
World
Cup tie-breaker rules – four criteria based on each teams' play;
but if still tied, they draw lots to see who advances
(http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2061793-brazil-world-cup-2014-clarifying-group-tie-break-scenarios-and-rules)
sounds
rather random.
On
the other hand, there are two teams equally prepared to move on in
the tournament. Why not cast lots? And I bet lots of prayers would
be said just prior to the casting of lots!
If we
do our work well as the body of Christ. If we equip those in our
midst to witness to the resurrection. If we prayerfully seek God's
guidance, then choosing those for leadership should be as easy as
casting lots.
No comments:
Post a Comment