Thursday, January 31, 2013

"Jesus Is the One Who Calls" Mark 1: 16-20

The service has an clear illustration in the ordination and installation of elders and deacons.

I am trying to be concrete in my sermons in ways that access our daily living.

Two thoughts:  When Jesus calls, we have to leave something behind.  Any stories you could share that illustrate that?  Maybe it is leaving our home behind, maybe our fear, maybe our self-consciousness, or ???


Secondly, Jesus calls us to something.  Disciples were called to new tasks.


Frederick Buechner once described calling this way: “The place God calls you to is the place where your deep gladness and the world’s deep hunger meet.” Frederick Buechner. Wishful Thinking: A Theological ABC (1973), p. 95.


Monday, January 28, 2013

Reflections on "Who Do You Say That I Am?" Mark 8: 27-30

I used a Wordle poster for the visual aspect of the sermon, and I will use a different one each week. Kind of a cool way to print the message.  Clearly, the Wordle was not as exciting as the brightly wrapped gift that adorned the pulpit area during Advent, but it will have to do.  I hope that during the course of this sermon series our monitors will become functional in our Sanctuary so that the Wordle can be put on the screen.

The sermon went ok.  I have to confess it was a bit weird to actually be preaching behind a pulpit in the Sanctuary.  I felt a little tied down, which suggests I need to find a more comfortable use of my notes.  I found myself looking at them a lot more than I did when I was preaching without the pulpit.  Not sure if that was noticeable to the congregation, but I felt it.

This is one of my favorite passages to preach.  My symmetrical side noticed that the first of the three points was much longer than the following two.   I suppose the first point could have been restructured as the whole sermon.

Somehow in my corrections after preaching the sermon early Sunday morning I deleted the passage from SJ Jacobs book.  I didn't notice until after the sermon had been preached in the Chapel.  The sermon seemed to flow well without that passage, so I did not put it back in for the Sanctuary service.

My ending was open-ended and intended to be thought provoking.  Not sure how well it worked.  I added "begin to..." for the Sanctuary service.  Not sure it made a difference.



Who Do You Say That I Am?” 1/27/13; FPC, Troy Mark 8: 27-30; Jesus Is the One Who... preaching series

Introduction: We begin a new preaching series this week with Jesus' question: who do you say that I am.

We will then spend each week reflecting on “Jesus in the one who...” and fill in the blank

In keeping with that theme, I am going to ask a person in the chapel and sanctuary service each week to share briefly how they would fill in the blank after “Jesus is the one who...” If you want to be one of those who shares your answer, please let me know.

We will travel through Lent, then Palm Sunday, the Maundy Thursday, then good Friday, then Easter, and Jesus' post resurrection appearances, and learn from those events something that will help us finish the sentence, “Jesus is the one who...”

Finally, on the first Sunday in May when we come to our Lord's Table; when we listen as our confirmands answer the question, “who do you say that I am? with their profession of faith profess their faith; on the morning each of of will be better prepared to claim that answer for ourselves.

WE begin with three things to note about Jesus' question “Who do you say that I am?”

Move 1: First of all, it is an very important question

a. Critical place in the gospel of Mark.
  1. Almost exactly at the book's midpoint, this passage initiates a major shift in Mark's plot.

  2. The word Christ has not appeared since the Gospel's opening verse. We have had seven-plus chapters of Jesus' ministry, questions asked about his true identity and authority, secrets told and disclosure promised, and demonic powers identifying Jesus as God's Son.

  3. We the readers have no idea that Christ's death is just around the corner.
    1. But after Peter announces, “You are the Christ” or “You are the Messiah” the race is on to Jesus' death and resurrection. He not only will die soon, but he has to share with his disciples the challenges they will encounter. The high demand that will be placed on those who will follow him.
5. This question marks the turning point in the Gospel of Mark.

b. The place where the question is asked is also of great importance.
  1. Jesus asks the question when he is near Caesarea Philippi, a very Roman setting. It is Jesus' first time in Roman territory.

      2. Caesarea Philippi also represents the northward extension of Israel's power when it was once a world power.

      3. In a place that that screams of worldly, Roman power, in a place that exemplifies the limitations of Israel's power, Jesus asks “who do they say that I am?
4.and Peter answers “You are the Messiah” to affirm that Jesus in the one who will overcome worldly powers and sweep beyond the limitations of Israel.

5. This question is asked in an important place.
      c. Important question because it demands more than a rational response.

      1. When the disciples answer the question with John, Elijah, or one of the prophets, they give sensible, rational answers.

      2. Jesus does seem like these others with his calls to repentance, healings, and meals served in the wilderness.
    3. But Peter looks beyond the reasonable, he looks beyond the rational, he looks beyond all the data that says who Jesus should be, and he answers from his heart and his hope.

    4. “You are the one who will change the world. You are the one offers me something more than the world. You are the one in whom I can place all my hopes and dreams. You are the Messiah.”
Jesus' question demands an answer that goes beyond the realm of reasonable and enters the realm of faith.

Move 2: secondly, we notice that Jesus does not want the disciples to share their answer yet.

a. After commending Peter for his answer, Jesus instructs the disciples to tell no one.
  1. Lots has been made of this demand for silence.
    1. Biblical scholars have spent many hours and pages exploring the question and not really answering it definitively.
b. But it was clear that it was not time to announce that Jesus was the Christ.
  1. Before they do that, they have to learn more about Jesus.
    1. They will have to witness his death.
    1. They will have to come to some realization about what it means to be his disciples.
    1. In fact, before the scene ends, Jesus announces, for the first of multiple times, his impending suffering, rejection, death, and resurrection. He also -- finally! -- starts to tell his disciples and others just what he wants from them.
b. Most of us here have professed our faith in Jesus Christ at some time or another.
  1. 1. If you have not, I hope that today or in the coming days you will hear more about Jesus and want to profess your faith in him as your Lord and Savior.
2. I'm not asking those who have already professed their faith in Christ to undo it.

3. But I invite all of you to explore who Jesus is so that we can reaffirm our faith knowing more about the one in whom we first professed our faith.

Move 3: thirdly, we are going to shift the question.

a. NT Wright, the well-respected New Testament scholar in his book Simply Jesus (pp. 1-3) discusses the importance to his life of faith and study of Jesus this question “Who do you say that I am?”
  1. But, he also notes that early on in his ministry as he sought to answer Jesus' question, “who do you say that I am,” the musical “Jesus Christ, Superstar” hit the theaters.

  2. When originally produced, the musical met lots of resistance from churches for the way in which Jesus was portrayed.

  3. Wright had a different response as he saw Jesus in this new way. He wrote that as he heard sung the question, “Jesus Christ, Superstar, who are you?” and he began to realize the importance of answering the question, “Who are you Jesus?” as he sought to answer the question “Who do you say that I am? That Jesus asked.
      b. So we embark on that journey of discovering again, and in new ways, who Jesus is.
  1. Through the years, I have often introduced questions of faith with youth by creating this scene: You are sitting in the cafeteria at the high school, or the Jr. High, or your elementary school and someone sits down next to you and says, “You go to church don't you? I don't know much about (whatever the topic is – in this case Jesus). Who is the Jesus guy?
    1. So there you are: on lunch break at work; or sitting in the stands at your kid's basketball game; or standing out on the street after shoveling some snow; and someone comes up to you and says, “ hey, you go to church don't you. I've been meaning to ask, 'What can you tell me about this Jesus guy?”
      Conclusion: And you begin to answer, “Jesus is the one who...”


      For the historical-textual information in this sermon, I consulted study notes on the Mark passage written by Matt Skinner, Associate Professor of New Testament, Luther Seminary St. Paul, MN at http://www.workingpreacher.org/preaching.aspx?lect_date=9/16/2012&tab=4 which I found on www.textweek.com

Friday, January 25, 2013

"Who Do You Say That I Am?" Mark 8: 27-30

This sermon kicks off what is an expanded Lenten preaching series.  We begin this week, go through Lent, and then finish back where we started on May 3 with the confirmands standing before the congregation to declare that they say Jesus is their Lord and Savior.

The Advent preaching series seemed to appeal to many in the congregation, so I've been trying to figure out what made it work to include it in this next series.  Maybe it was the topic of gifts?  maybe the visuals?  maybe be I was especially energized by the topic?  I do have a visual each week, but it's not quite as exciting as the giant Christmas present.

I also think that in my sermon preparation I worked hard to make the sermons concrete and easy to follow (using more of an outline form than I often do).  I may try to continue to do that in this series.  At this point, I don't have my three points yet.  As I'm brainstorming, it occurs to me that 1. It's an important question.  2. Jesus does not want them to answer it yet (maybe until they know more)  3.  Not sure of a third point yet.  Maybe that the answer calls on our rational and emotional parts of us.  With that in mind, here is a story from AJ Jacob:  A.J. Jacobs does the Rationality Project, where he tries to live rationally. Example: he has brushed with Crest for 30 yrs. Why? He traces it back to Jr. high camp in Maine when the cool kid in his cabin used Crest. He notes Buridan's ass – the donkey in a philosophical parable who is hungry and thirsty and standing equidistant between water and food. He dies deciding what to do. A. J. Jacob, The Guinea Pig Diaries (87-88)

Starting next week, the tag line for each sermon is "Jesus is the one who...." In keeping with that theme, I am going to ask a person in the chapel and sanctuary service each week to share their answer to that question in a minute for two.  If you want to be one of those who shares your answer, please let me know.

Peace,

Richard

Monday, January 14, 2013

Reflections on "Five in One" Genesis 49: 1-28; Galatians 3: 26-29


I preached this sermon as part of our Bicentennial celebration.  The history buffs probably enjoyed it; others might have found it a bit dry.  Having others participate in the vignettes certainly helped the sermon.  

The challenge in preparation was taking all the historical information provided and culling it down to a manageable amount.  Also, to try and find the "gospel" in the historical data.  I attempted to point out some recurring themes in our history that might speak to us today.

At the end of the sermon are an abundance of references if anyone wants to read more about these splits and reunions in the history of the Presbyterian denominations in the United States and in the particular case of First Presbyterian Church, Troy, OH.

As I worked with this sermon, I realized how much growing up in a Texas congregation that was a union congregation (both Northern and Southern branches) in a union Synod mattered.  It also became clear when I moved to Troy that the Northern-Southern split that impacted church life in the South and Southwest (For different classes in seminary, I actually wrote a paper on why the churches did not reunite immediately following the Civil War and another paper on why some Northern Presbyterian churches were in the South and thrived, while others areas in the South either had no Northern churches or the churches did very poorly in the South).  It became clear in FPC, Troy's history that the split had little impact on the church. Of course, the Old School/New School split that figured prominently in Troy's history meant little to the churches in Texas that were started after that split.  A reminder that our context does impact our worldview.

Five in One” January 13, 2013; FPC, Troy Bicentennial Sunday; Genesis 49: 1-28; Galatians 3: 26-29

Introduction: Almost as soon as God creates, humans begin dividing themselves.

For example, sin divides Cain and Abel.

but there are some positives about division.

Israel segregated from the rest of the world. We hear from Genesis how Israel was divided into twelve tribes

a. Give identity.

b. Allow for specific tasks.

In response to the coming of Christ, we are called to be one.

We live in that tension – called to be one; continually being separated.

We look around the world and see divisions – nations; ethnicities; self-selected groups.

We see it within the Christian church; we see it within our own Presbyterian denomination (look at the insert in the worship folder to see how many times we have been divided and then united); as we study our history during the Bicentennial, we see it in our own church.

First Presbyterian Church, Troy, OH has been part of five different denominations.

Move 1: Presbyterian Church, USA

when those fifteen pioneering spirits met to organize First Presbyterian Church, they had multiple options within the Christian tradition, and within the Presbyterian tradition as well.

Let's listen as Alexander Telford, one of the founding members and driving force behind the creation of First Presbyterian Church, and an unnamed townsperson discuss the formation of First Presbyterian Church, Troy, OH

Random Man: Mr. Telford, might I ask a question of you. I heard at the store this morning that you are going to be starting a church.

Alex Telford: Yes we are. God has called us to start a Presbyterian church here. In fact, yesterday, on Sept. 13, 1813, Rev. John Thompson moderated a meeting at which we formed First Presbyterian Church of Miami Presbytery of the Presbyterian Church of the United States of America.

Random: A Presbyterian Church? Why I didn't think you were Presbyterian. Or that Rev. Thompson was Presbyterian anymore. I thought you worshipped with those New Light churches that Rev. Thompson started a few years ago.

Alex Telford: Do you know Rev. John Thompson?

Random: I've never met him, but I've heard him preach a time or two over in Springfield. The Spirit really moves him, and I mean moves!

Alex: I find little humor in a man being filled with the Spirit while preaching.

Random: I heard the Presbyterians kicked him out of their church.

Alex: And I find little humor with those spiritless ministers at the Synod of Kentucky who could not see beyond their Calvinist doctrine of predestination to see how the Spirit can move people to have faith when they hear the Word preached.

Random: You sound like one of those camp revivalists.

Alex: Not quite, but I do believe that the Presbyterian Church does not give enough credence to the New Light movement. I agree with the Calvinists that about predestination, but I also think we need to consider the role of free will. To some of those Calvinists, that makes me sound like an Arminian. But if you have been to a camp-meeting revival, you know that the Spirit does work on people when God's Word is preached.

Random: So why did you start a Presbyterian Church?

Alex: Well, I do think a church needs some structure; I do believe that the Calvinist theology provides a strong foundation; and I believe that having elders lead the church is important. Not to mention, my family heritage in Scotland was with the Presbyterian Church.

Random: Maybe I'll come out to worship with you one Sunday.

Alex: We'd love to have you join us.


Thus, we begin our journey as a congregation as part of the Presbyterian Church, USA

Move 2: Old School/New school

that would not last very long, roughly 25 years. By 1838, there was dissension in the pews. The groups were labeled Old School and New School.

Did they divide over theology? Yes, at stake was what it meant to be the church and who could serve as the church's pastor.

But, it was more than just theology.

New School group generally had people who had been in the United States longer.

Old School group generally had people who were more recent immigrants. Telford would be an example – just a generation removed from Scotland and the strong Presbyterian influence there.

From a socio-economic perspective, New School had more of the business people, who catered to the transients traveling through this area, and thus were more secularized.

Old School had more landowners, who were insulated from the secular world.

Let's listen as two women, Isabella Yuart and Mary Ann Telford Orbison discuss the split in the church. Isabella was a founding member and in this split sided with the Old School group. Mary Ann, despite being the daughter of founding member Alexander Telford sided with the Old School, Mary Ann joined the New School side of things. A family split in their church loyalty.

Isabella Yuart: Mary, I can't believe the church is splitting.

Mary Ann Telford Orbison: I don't know. It sorta seems like churches do. I remember when I was younger when my father and Rev. Thompson got in trouble with the Presbyterian Church and they were part of the New Light church for awhile.

Isabella Yuart: I suppose, but it saddens me to think that our local church is parting ways. Look at you, your father, a founding member like me, is going with the Old School congregation and you, his daughter are going with the New School congregation.

Mary: Not all of the founding members are joining with you and my father in the Old School. Some of them coming with the New school.

Isabella: yes, it seems to have divided us in lots of different ways.

Mary: I suppose one good thing is that the Session recognized the importance of having the women involved in the discussion.

Isabella: They knew better than to make that decision with just the men elders on the Session deciding without hearing from all the members of the church, including the women.

Mary: I know. Ever since they announced the meeting six months ago and made such a big deal that the women should be invited, I figured they recognized that the women needed to be part of this decision.

Mary: I just wish the General Assembly had not reacted so drastically to expel those Synods and churches.

Isabella: Maybe when you are older you will see the wisdom of their actions. It is important to uphold the standards for the clergy and how churches are to be organized. If not, no telling what kind of churches would claim to be Presbyterian.

Mary: all I know is that when my father was a young man, he rebelled against the church authorities and thought it was okay for churches to try something new. Now, he's against any change.

Isabella: As I said, maybe when you get to be your father's and my age you'll understand this better. I just wish the church did not have to divide over this issue.

Mary: I guess they are serious about dividing as well. I mean we voted to sell the church so the the Old School and New School groups could start their own churches.

Isabella: That's true. But I was not that surprised. When the committee that was supposed to find a better site for the church returned without a recommendation, I figured it meant that members were worried about the future of the church. There has been a lot of grumbling going on in the church pews the last few years.

Mary: There sure has, particularly since every does not agree on the standards the church should have.

Isabella: It's kind of ironic, though, that everyone seems to be able to work together to separate us.

Mary: I did like how we worked together to create a fair plan. When the building is sold, each group gets the percentage of the money based on the percentage of their members who are in their group.

Isabella: They even included people who come regularly and give, but are not members. We seem to get along better as we divide ourselves than we did when we were trying to be one church.
Mary: Maybe one day we'll be back together as one church.

Isabella: I wouldn't count on it. We'll probably have more splits in the future, not less.

Mary: That's not very hopeful.

Isabella: I guess I shouldn't be so pessimistic, but this I'm just feeling bad about things. This year we should be celebrating the 25th anniversary of First Presbyterian Church in Troy. Instead, we're spending our time figuring out the best way to divide First Presbyterian Church.

First Presbyterian becomes both Old School, PCUSA and New School, PCUSA, with the Old School congregation eventually residing in a church on Main St. across from the Court House (where our offices were during the building of our new building) and the New School congregation purchasing the plot of lot on which our sanctuary sits and building it.

Move 3: PCUSA Reunited

The Old School/New school split lasted only last thirty-two years, which is not very long as splits go.

In 1870 the Old School and New School factions came together.

Description of the reunion in 1870 "a total surrender of all the great testimonies of the Church for the fundamental doctrines of grace."

The pendulum swung away from theological correctness toward gracious unity.

Although it did not impact this congregation, we might also note that the Presbyterian Church of the Confederate States broke of from the PCUSA during the Civil War, and after the Civil War no reunion took place, so nationally, there was the PCUSA (northern branch) and the PCUS (Southern branch), not to mention a variety of smaller Presbyterian denominations.

Move 4: UPCUSA

As the Presbyterian Church moved through the 20th century, there were small reunions. The PCUSA absorbed most of the Cumberland Presbyterian churches in 1906 and then in 1920 it absorbed the Welsh Calvinist Methodist Church. Neither of those mergers changed the name of the denomination. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presbyterian_Church_(U.S.A.)

But in 1958, a merger took place with the United Presbyterian Church of North America. It began as a mostly ethnic Scottish denomination, but after some years it grew somewhat more and more ethnically diverse, although universally English-speaking, and was geographically centered in Western Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio, areas of heavy Scottish and Scotch-Irish settlement on the American frontier. Within that territory, a large part of its adherents lived in rural areas, which amplified the denomination's already highly traditionalist worldview. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Presbyterian_Church_of_North_America

Of interest to us locally, the cornerstone seminary of the UPNA was Pittsburgh-Xenia seminary, which grew had roots in Xenia, OH.

Again, theological differences gave way to the desire to be unified.

Thus, FPC, Troy became part of the newly named United Presbyterian Church, USA.

Move 5: Back to PCUSA

One major rift remained – the Northern and Southern branches of the Presbyterian Church.

As early as the turn of the century, some worked for reunion.

But, as the 20th century dragged on, there seemed to be no consensus for reunion.

Were the differences theological – yes. Both branches could point to theological differences such as biblical interpretation and how the church leadership operated.

But it might also be noted that the issue of race relations and states rights vs. the role of the federal government also impacted calls for reunion.

As reunion appeared to be on the horizon, splits took place across the denomination and both the Presbyterian Church of America and the Evangelical Presbyterian Church were created.

In 1983, reunion finally took place.

Frances Miles commissioner to the 1983 General Assembly where the two denominations joined together.

Listen to what she might have written in her diary.

Frances Miles: When I was elected to be a commissioner to the General Assembly in 1983, I knew it was the General Assembly when the Southern Presbyterian Church and the Northern Presbyterian Church would be reunited for the first time since the Civil War, but I had no idea how significant a moment that was in the life of the church.

In my church in Troy and in Miami Presbytery, we haven't talked much about the split between the Northern and Southern branches of the Presbyterian Church. I quickly learned, however, that reunion meant a lot to many people.
And it upset lots of others. I was very surprised when someone told me that in Mississippi alone, 126 Presbyterian churches left the Southern Presbyterian Church because they were against reunion. Wow!

But when we did the vote for reunion, it became very emotional After the commissioners from our General Assembly and the General Assembly of the Southern Presbyterian Church voted simultaneously in our different meetings to reunite, we stopped the meeting and went out into the streets of Atlanta and marched together, all the commissioners from both General Assemblies, through downtown Atlanta to City Hall. People marched with arm in arm to show our unity; banners were displayed announcing we were reunited; tears flowed as we marched and sang. At City Hall, the Mayor of Atlanta spoke to us as we celebrated our reunion. I will never forget that day.

As part of our vote to reunite, we also established a committee that was commissioned to write a new confession. It will be really neat one day to have a new confession for the Presbyterian Church and know that I was there when we reunited and asked for a new confession to be written.

I know that the church is still divided in lots of ways around our world, but a few more Presbyterian churches now are showing what it means to be united in Christ.

Back to PCUSA

Move 6: Five denominations. Lots of other Presbyterian groups in the United States.

Division and union.

Theology and the secular shaping the options.

To a large degree, the changes reflect where we fall on the continuum of theological correctness or the desire to be united?

On the one hand, the challenge to the church to stand up for the Truth; On the other hand, who knows the truth completely.

In 1875, five years after the Northern Branch reunited, the southern Branch tried again to gain momentum for uniting with Northern Church. At their General assembly, a minister argued: "If, after all the great sacrifices of confessors and martyrs of past ages, we alone constitute the true church; if this only is the result of the stupendous sacrifice on Calvary and the struggles of apostles and missionaries and reformers in all generations; then may God have mercy on the world and his church." (“Division & Reunion in the Presbyterian Church, U.S.,” R. Milton Winter, the Journal of presbyterian History, http://www.history.pcusa.org/resources/jph/2000/spring/DivisionAndReunionPCUS.html)



An argument for unity over maintaining the true church.

In our time, we find churches leaving our presbytery and other presbyteries over theology, ordination issues, primarily.

Interestingly enough, the churches that have left our Presbytery have joined with the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, which came into being in 1981 as conservative churches from both the Northern and Southern branches joined together in response to what they believed was the liberal bent of both the Northern and Southern churches.

History repeats itself.

Conclusion: Our history here at FPC reflects the Presbyterian Church's history in the United States, which reflects the humanity f God's creation.

Divide and unite. Never quite satisfied. Never quite living fully into the image of God.

Five denominations; one Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, who calls us to be one.


Resources for sermon: The background for this sermon was researched by Teri Okrutny from the following sources.







Books:

Acts and Proceedings of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America in the Year 1801
Plan of Union begins on PDF page 7

Minutes of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, 1832-1836
1832 begins on PDF page 8
1833 begins on PDF page 160
1834 begins on PDF page 312
1835 begins on PDF page 490
1836 begins on PDF page 534

Minutes of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, 1837 – State of the Church information begins on PDF page 24 (document page 430).

Presbyterianism North of the Ohio – book page 9 (PDF page 14) has New Lights info – This is a short book (about 10 pages) with a lot of information about the early 19th century.

Information about John Thompson and the New Lights in Springdale, Ohio - http://www.springdale.org/History/SPRING2.html

Additional information about the ministers who signed the Last Will and Testament of the Springfield Presbytery can be found at http://thediscipler.blogspot.com/2005/02/last-will-and-testament.html

The Cane Ridge Web site URL is http://www.caneridge.org/


Scroll a little over halfway down the page to the paragraph that begins with “A matter which is entirely germane to the subject of this chapter-the settlement of the Miami valley-is the Great Kentucky revival, and its subsequent camp-meetings…”

Presbyterian Historical Society Denominational History - http://www.history.pcusa.org/history/


Monday, January 7, 2013

Reflections on "Gifts You Can't Buy at the Store: A New Direction" Matthew 2: 1-12; 2 Corinthians 5: 16-21

This was my favorite sermon topic of the series when I began the sermon.  Not sure it turned out to be the best sermon of the series, but...

The difference between the Chapel sermon, when I preached from the pulpit with notes easily available, and the Sanctuary sermon, when I preached without the pulpit and notes less accessible, was the most pronounced of the series.  Not sure which worked better.  The liturgist (my daughter Caitlin) quickly noted when I sat down after the sermon in the Sanctuary service that the ending worked better in the Sanctuary service!  I had already made some mental adjustments to conclusion after the Chapel service, and I have added them in the sermon text below.

Two weeks without a sermon series (Bicentennial themed sermon this Sunday and then the Annual meeting service the next Sunday), but then I begin a lengthy series entitled: "Jesus 101" or "Jesus Is the One Who..."

Here's the sermon.

Gifts You Can't Buy at the Store: A New Direction” January 6, 2013; Epiphany Sunday; FPC, Troy; Matthew 2: 1-12;

Introduction: Texas A&M Nutcracker; as you can guess, a Christmas gift for my wife; order the second week of December and due to arrive by Dec. 21, then Dec. 22, then the 24th, then, without explanation, due to arrive on January 2; if finally arrived on January 4;
I didn't even wrap it. I took it out of the package, Leslie looked at it, and then it went straight into the storage box; straight from the mailing box to the storage box on its way to the attic.
Christmas gifts that arrive late are a bit anti-climactic.
This last gift you can't buy in the store, the gift of a new direction, arrives late in the Christmas story. God de3livers it to the wise men, who have arrived to see Christ long after the excitement of his birth, long after the angels have sung in the night, long after the shepherds have come and gone.
But this last gift delivers life-saving, life-changing opportunities.

Move 1: The gift of new direction saves.
a. Danger is in the air at this point in the story as told by the Gospel of Matthew.
  1. The wise men have had to ask King Herod for directions, and when King Herod hears they are going to find the newborn King of the Jews, he recognizes a threat to his power and plots to kill.
  2. He invites the wise men to stop by on their way home and tell them about this baby they seek.
  3. We do not know if Herod planned to kill the wise men, but his actions indicate that is what he planned for baby Jesus.
  4. But like a GPS that reroutes drivers to avoid problems in the route ahead, the wise men are warned in a dream to take a different route home.
  5. That buys enough time for Joseph and Mary to flee with baby Jesus to Egypt to escape King Herod's wrath and it keep the wise men out of the clutches of an angry King Herod.
  6. The new direction God gave the wise men new direction to protect them. How do new directions protect/save us? I'm thinking about interactive GPS that reroute us around traffic accidents.
b. The new direction God gives the wise men reveals again God persistent desire to save.
  1. King Herod represents the ways of the world that threaten us.
  2. The desire for power; the desire to control; the worldview that has no room for others and sees everyone and everything as a threat.
  3. God offers us a new direction, one that saves us from the King Herod's of the world.
Move 2: The gift of new direction saves us, but also invites us to follow a new path.
a. The wise men go home a different way.
  1. I have driven from Troy to Texas enough times that the route unfolds like an old friend. I know the Burger King in OKC that is a great place to stop when we've left before dawn from my mother's house; then there's the exit in Tulsa that is the last gas stop before the Turnpike begins; there's a place on I-44 where I had a 1:00 am conversation with my sister in Spokane one summer as my girls slept in the van and I took advantage of the three hour time difference; downtown Indianapolis means we are almost home (or just getting started depending on which direction we're headed). There is comfort in the familiar route.
    1. The wise men will find no landmarks that they had passed on the way to Bethlehem because they are returning a different path
3. Every unfamiliar turn is a reminder that their lives have been radically changed by meeting this baby born in Bethlehem.

b. That's the way it should be, shouldn't it? Meet the Christ-child and suddenly the world looks different.

1. that's what happened to the Apostle Paul.

2. He starts down the road to Damascus as Saul, the persecutor of Christian; he meets the Risen Christ; and then finishes the journey as Paul, who will become the great evangelizer of Christians.

3. No wonder he writes to the Corinthians the words we read this morning.
      4. Everyone who is in Christ is a new creation.
    1. We no longer regard the world from a human point of view.

      c. The Journey of the Magi,” T. S. Eliot writes:
All this was a long time ago, I remember,
And I would do it again, but set down
This set down
This: were we led all that way for
Birth or Death? There was a Birth, certainly,
We had evidence and no doubt. I had seen birth and death,
But had thought they were different; this Birth was
Hard and bitter agony for us, like Death, our death.
We returned to our places, these Kingdoms,
But no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation,
With an alien people clutching their gods.
I should be glad of another death.


  1. Eliot envisions the world of magi after they have met Christ and sees world that appears different to the magi.
  1. Has the world changed? No, but they have been changed by Christ coming into the world?
    3. What does it mean on your life that you have met God in flesh?
Conclusion: gift of a compass; I suppose you might have preferred gold, frankincense, or myrrh from the story in Matthew.

The compass is a small gift (admittedly purchased in a store), but a reminder of the God who meets you in Christ and sends you in new directions.



Thursday, January 3, 2013

"Gifts You Can't Buy at the Store: A New Direction" Matthew 2: 1-12; 2 Corinthians 5: 16-21


The final gift builds off the story of the three wise men, and the fact that after meeting Jesus they have to go home following a different route.

A few thoughts on the text:

1.  Sometimes going a different route opens us up to new opportunities.

2.  Powerful poem from T. S. Eliot -- below is the final stanza.

The Journey of the Magi,” T. S. Eliot writes:
All this was a long time ago, I remember,
And I would do it again, but set down
This set down
This: were we led all that way for
Birth or Death? There was a Birth, certainly,
We had evidence and no doubt. I had seen birth and death,
But had thought they were different; this Birth was
Hard and bitter agony for us, like Death, our death.
We returned to our places, these Kingdoms,
But no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation,
With an alien people clutching their gods.
I should be glad of another death.

3. God gave the wise men new direction to protect them.  How do new directions protect/save us?  I'm thinking about interactive GPS that reroute us around traffic accidents.

4.  An encounter with the Christ-child forced new directions -- the T.S. Eliot poem notes the uneasiness of the wise men as they returned to their lives and see things differently.

5. What does it mean to our lives that we Christ has been born?

6. Paul certainly builds on the image of being changed by an encounter with Christ.  In fact, his life experience indicates radical change takes place when we encounter Christ.

Peace,

Richard